Edubloggers go two places: the faculty lounge and the seminar room.
The best blogs fit the first category—in the faculty lounge we can ask questions about pedagogy and share fears about research without fretting over how we’ll look to our committee members and peers. Take, for example, Sisyphus’s recent remarks about a class observation: there is no equivalent forum, at least at my university, that would have allowed her to articulate in such detail her response to and concerns about this observation while inviting both support and structured feedback. This sort of thoughtful back-and-forth is what blogs do best.
That’s not to say that edublogs are all rainbows and milkshakes: for every blog that fosters supportive dialog among a community of instructors there is another blog dishing gossip about faculty and students. (Exhibit A: the surprising honesty of one of Scott Eric Kaufman’s readers.)
But just because the call-and-response structure of blogs is more suited to the faculty lounge doesn’t mean they can’t be adapted to do the work of the seminar room: medievalists and comp/rhetors regularly use their communities to tackle disciplinary questions. Here are just some of the more active seminarian medievalists (Shana Worthen has a fuller catalog):
- Alliterative
- Blogenspiel
- Corner of 10-century Europe, A
- Digital Medievalist: Scéla
- Heavenfield
- In the Middle
- Mern Þonke
- Modern Medieval
- Unlocked Wordhoard
- Wormtalk and Slugspeak
I was going to give a list of comp/rhet blogs too, but I don’t want to spend all afternoon doing this. Just go to Schizzes and Flows and read Scot’s blogroll.
Here’s my question: Why isn’t there a modernist lit seminar room out there? There are a couple blogs dedicated to the subject—Beyond Modernity hosts weekly essays on the theory and context of mod/pomo studies, and the blogger at Modern Kicks digests goings-on in the world of post-1900 art history.
There are plenty of other bloggers out there writing on 20th-century lit, but it’s rare to see posts about their work. I’ve certainly not said anything about Proust or Virginia Woolf in my time posting here, but part of that comes from not knowing if there’s an audience out there; when a medievalist asks for help compiling a bibliography it’s because he knows his readers will have answers. (Though asking, in the parlance of blogs, is blegging—blugh.)
Would it be possible to create a more visible community of modbloggers?
I’m hopeful that there might be enough simmering interest in this subject, if we can just find the right folks, to put together a roundtable for MSA X (Nashville, Nov. 13-16). If you’re at all interested, I’d love to hear from you! You can email me (mshapiro at gmail dot com) or just comment below.

hi Mike — I’ve just been reading some of your back posts after coming through from Sisyphus’. I’m not sure if I’d be 100% on board with un-anonymizing myself at MSA (although I’m not sure why not either; I’d have to think it through more), but it’s an intriguing proposal. Hmm.
Hi, Kermit! I’m really happy to see you here, especially in the comments of this poor unloved post.
There are a few dozen reasons this CFP hasn’t been successful, but I think you touch on the main one: for many academics, blogs allow us to do what we do best (kvetch; write) without the restraint implied by institutional supervision.
I feel strongly that there is a space for academic blogs about academic things with our academic names attached, but that is obviously not the main reason academics come to blogging.
Unfortunately, the MSA options are not altogether attractive to an anonymous blogger. Even if there were to be present at the panel a named representative of anonymous bloggers, your post here would pretty much give you away.
Have you thought about starting an academic blog under your name? It’s a bit lonely right now in modblogland.
I’ve started to respond to this comment a number of times, but I’ve gotten hung up on the reasons for non-pseudonymous academic blogging vs. pseudonymous half-academic, half-personal blogging, which is my current status. I might try to think through some of this and post about it later. In any case, good to meet you. :)
Note to world: Kermit continued these thoughts over on her log.
I found a modernist for you: http://kulturindustrie.blogspot.com/
Sometimes he links to me (!!!!).
Oh wait, that last part wasn’t supposed to be out loud.
Neat, Sisyphus! Thanks for the link!
I read a lot of Mark Scroggins’s work—especially Upper Limit Music—when I was working on a paper about “A”. That was almost certainly the best essay I wrote for a seminar, not least because his arguments were engaging and fun to reply to.
Plus: if Mark Scroggins keeps a blog then he at least serves as a positive argument against some of the critiques of litblogging: his blog has neither hampered his scholarly writing nor degraded his status in the eyes of academia.
Well, I’m over a month late here – but I just found you and followed the “modernism” category link. (And am very happy to have done so.) I am also not sure about breaking my anonymity (such as it is) at a panel at MSA…but I do intend to be there. I think we should do a blogger meetup, for sure…With Kermit, there’s at least one other. I’m sure more will come out of the woodwork…
That plan sounds excellent, Hilaire! Watching all the medievalists arrange Kalamazoo meetups has been filling me with jealousy.